Skip to main content

The Murder Question

Why is it wrong to murder?

The answer to this question seems obvious and even nonsensical to most people. In this post I will explain briefly how the Christian and atheist differ in their reasoning. For argument's sake I will define murder as the willful taking of an innocent life.

A Christian believes it is wrong to murder because God says - Do not murder. To a Christian, God is the supreme law giver and disobeying  God's law has eternal consequences. The taking of an innocent life can lead a person to eternal damnation. The atheist also might believe that it is wrong to murder, but the reasoning isn't as clear since atheism is relativistic in nature. Atheism for the most part doesn't believe in moral absolutes.

There are 2 arguments which atheists commonly make regarding the murder issue: 1) The environmental/cultural argument, and the 2) the utilitarian argument.

I will briefly explain both positions:

1)The environmental/cultural argument. 

Since atheists don't believe in an absolute law giver, they argue instead that the environment/culture of a person determines weather it is right to murder or not. The atheist might agree that murder is wrong but not on objective grounds. Proponents of this argument say that human behavior is shaped exclusively by  the customs of that culture or society.

The problem with this argument is obvious to any person with basic historical knowledge. Firstly, not every culture prohibits murder. There are many cultures throughout history and in the present which promoted and even advocated murder.  An example of this were the ancient Inca who performed ritual human sacrifices on children in order to appease their gods.  Another example of this ideology is radical Islam which promotes murder to those who won't pledge their allegiance to Allah. What made Judaism so unique was that it was the first culture in history to publicly outlaw murder.

2)The utilitarianism argument.  Utilitarianism is a fancy philosophical word which means that morality is based on its usefulness to a given society. To an atheist, being good is utilitarian. Something is good because it is useful.

The problem with this reasoning is that  morality isn't always useful  Jesus dying on the cross wasn't useful, but necessary to the spread of Christianity.  St. Theresa of Calcutta helping dying lepers wasn't useful since these people were destined to die, doomed by their specific caste system.  Why build hospitals? Why take care of the poor? Why protect the lives of unborn fetuses? All of these actions would be immoral to most atheists since they are not "useful." Some atheists throughout history have advocated the whole scale murdering of certain people on the grounds that it was more expedient to do so for the greater good of their society. (Think of concentration camps, gulags, abortion, euthanasia, and ethnic cleansing.)

To be fair, of course not all atheists are immoral. Many atheists are exceptionally moral and do great things for the world such as taking care of the poor, building schools, hospitals, fighting for their countries and many worthy philanthropic works. My argument to these exceptions would be that the individual atheist is being moral in spite of their worldview. Unwittingly these atheists through these moral actions are proving the existence of a god since God is the author of all good;whose existence they spend their lives trying to disprove. Atheism is immoral in nature since it doesn't believe in moral absolutes.  How can something be moral if morality doesn't exist in the first place? I know that there have been terrible, immoral so called  Christians throughout history, but the big difference here is that the moral standard of Judeo/Christianity  has never changed even if its people failed to live up to it.  Morality is objective, not subjective in nature. Just like gravity.  The law of gravity exists whether people choose to believe in it or not.   It's not an subjective thing.  Gravity is keeping our planet from shooting off  into the stratosphere and keeping our feet on the ground (literally)
Yet in Sir Isaac Newton's time there were nay-sayers  to this very basic truth.

As a people, we need to accept the concept of moral absolutes or a moral law.  Humanity is destined to annihilate itself if we don't come to a collective understanding of whether or not murder is wrong.


Popular posts from this blog

10 Great Quotes from The Book of Sirach

The book of Sirach is a book that is often overlooked in the bible. This is unfortunate since this book contains many wise, practical saying on how to live a virtous life. The book was believed to have been written between 200-175 B.C.E.

Here are ten quotes that I feel best reflect this timeless work.

1."Do not become a beggar by feasting with\borrowed money, when you have nothing in your purse." Sirach 18:33

2."In all you do remember the end of your life, and then you will never sin." 7:36

3.."Glory and dishonor come from speaking; a man's tongue is his downfall." 5:13"

4."A wise man is cautious in everything." 18:27

5."One who trusts others is light minded." 19:4

6."If you pursue justice, you will obtain it and wear it as a glorious robe." 27:8

7."Many have fallen by the edge of the sword, but no many as have fallen because of the tongue." 28:18

8." In all of your work be industrious and no sickness will…

George Michael, Carrie Fisher, and The Afterlife

I was stunned, as was most of the world was when I heard about the passing of George Michael on Christmas day.  Michael possessed enormous talent was and one of the most successful acts in the 1980's and early 90's

Shortly after Carrie Fisher died.  Fisher was famous for her legendary role as princess Leia from the Star Wars movies.  Strangely her mother also died the day after.

2016 was a notable year for celebrity deaths.

Some names include Prince, Glenn Frey, David Bowie,  Doris Roberts, Alan Rickman, and Muhammad Ali.

As a Catholic these deaths got me thinking about the transient nature of life and the inevitability of death.

Marcus Aurelius, the stoic, emperor, philosopher king wrote about the passing nature of life as he reflected, "Time is a sort of river of passing events, and strong is its current; no sooner is a thing brought to sight than it is swept by and another takes its place, and this too will be swept away."

Even though I agree mostly with Aurelius&…

Me vs. The Almighty

There is a famous scene in the Bible where Jacob wrestles with God.  Jacob fights with God until God takes out a bone from Jacob's thigh. Interestingly, God eventually relents and stops fighting with Jacob. After this dramatic incident, Jacob is renamed Israel which literally means, "he who struggles with God."

I can relate to this story.  Many times in my life I have argued with God. I still do. (my wife can attest to that.) Many times I have criticized his tactics, his ways, and his wisdom. In my worst moments, I have even used choice language. I have a complicated relationship with God. Like Jacob, I have wrestled with God. (thigh bone still intact)

Recently I approached a priest friend of mine and told him of my struggles with God.  I expected that he would chide me for my lack of respect and informality. What this priest said was illuminating and encouraging. He told me that it was OK at times to be angry with God, God understood. He, in fact, encouraged this honest…